Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fully format the code base with google-java-format #114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2017

Conversation

jbduncan
Copy link
Contributor

@jbduncan jbduncan commented Aug 7, 2017

Fixes #86.

As described in the commit message, I also took the opportunity to:

  • Add google-java-format as an automatic check when mvn verify is run (and by extension, automatically making it a Travis CI check).
  • Upgrade the pom.xml and .travis.yml to run and compile against Java 8 minimum (since the POM was still assuming a minimum of Java 6, and the Travis config was still testing against Java 7 JDKs).
  • Set up a default Maven goal, so that contributors now only need to run mvn to run mvn clean verify by default, which is probably what they want to check that their contributions work.
  • Upgrade some Maven plugin versions.
  • Update the contribution guidelines accordingly.

Also took the opportunity to:
- Add google-java-format as an automatic check when `mvn verify` is
  run (and by extension, automatically making it a Travis CI check).
- Upgrade the pom.xml and .travis.yml to run and compile against Java
  8 minimum (since the POM was still assuming a minimum of Java 6, and
  the Travis config was still testing against Java 7 JDKs).
- Set up a default Maven goal, so that contributors now only need to
  run `mvn` to run `mvn clean verify` by default, which is probably
  what they want to check that their contributions work.
- Upgrade some Maven plugin versions.
- Update the contribution guidelines accordingly.
@jbduncan jbduncan mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2017
@jrtom
Copy link
Owner

jrtom commented Aug 26, 2017

Wow, GitHub's diff continues to stun me with its inaccuracy. :P

Thanks for setting this up. :)

@jrtom jrtom merged commit d66037c into jrtom:common.graph Aug 26, 2017
@jbduncan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow, GitHub's diff continues to stun me with its inaccuracy. :P

Indeed. 😛

Thanks for setting this up. :)

You're welcome @jrtom! Many thanks for reviewing this. :)

@jbduncan jbduncan mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants