Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Because nobody could help me since daysI like to ask @SybexX if my problem is identical to #2742 and #3025 ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Sorry for being late with my answers:
@SybexX, I hope now you are able to answer my original question (raw recognition works but postprocessing turn it into error). As I do not deeply know the software and concepts behind, I believe that models are needed to build the raw value but have nothing to do with postprocessing the raw to the final value (differs by 1,0 as I wrote). What can turn e.g. 314,XXXX to 315,XXXX ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Why is the raw value equal to photo condition, but the final value is increased by one? Maybe the digital counter of my water meter is mechanically not optimal but the raw recognition is correct. What kicks the postprocessing to this wrong result?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions