Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dbx can only interpret debug info in some files #69

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue May 5, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

dbx can only interpret debug info in some files #69

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue May 5, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

also, sometime after r180, dbx is not happy with the debug info we produce
anymore: no more type info, no more line number info. could have been
caused by tmp fix for fred's issues on x86_64. need to fix this asap.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 9 Dec 2008 at 1:10

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

actually, this is not a regression. the behaviour was like this the whole time, 
I
just did not notice it. with some sources, line numbers work. with some type 
info
works. with some both work. with many, none work.

all possible COFF flags are the same in all cases.

COFF debugging info seems the same (and valid) in all cases.

Original comment by [email protected] on 9 Dec 2008 at 3:16

  • Added labels: binutils, gcc-debug

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

also, objdump -g presents nice debug info in all cases.

whether dbx recognizes (some part of) debug info is a function of the source 
code.
for some sources it works, for some it doesn't. no obvious reason.

Original comment by [email protected] on 9 Dec 2008 at 4:28

  • Changed title: dbx can only interpret debug info in some files
  • Added labels: Priority-Critical
  • Removed labels: Priority-High

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 10 Dec 2008 at 9:27

  • Added labels: Priority-Low
  • Removed labels: Priority-Critical

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant