You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand that it is planned to reintroduce some point specialisations to the model - I think that it would be good to add a specialisation that is a point on the unit sphere, which can be used for RA,Dec etc. Not sure what the best names for the two angles are though so that there is no bias towards a particular usage - but I guess that they could be the same as the equivalent angle names in the full three D spherical point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pahjbo
added a commit
to Javastro/CoordinateDM
that referenced
this issue
Jan 4, 2024
These updates address several issues
* ivoa-std#4
* ivoa-std#16
* and the discussion around Quantity where it does not have a "value" defined mean that for practical source generation a cartesian point with a real quantity is needed
IVOA base version 1.1 - potential for better unit.
I understand that it is planned to reintroduce some point specialisations to the model - I think that it would be good to add a specialisation that is a point on the unit sphere, which can be used for RA,Dec etc. Not sure what the best names for the two angles are though so that there is no bias towards a particular usage - but I guess that they could be the same as the equivalent angle names in the full three D spherical point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: