Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: replace #39

Open
conartist6 opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Feature: replace #39

conartist6 opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@conartist6
Copy link
Member

We should support the JS API for replacement so that the engine can be used to modify streams on the fly.
@conartist6
Copy link
Member Author

Actually there's probably an argument to be made for designing an API from scratch, and then perhaps implementing the JS API as an overlay onto it. I think this is one of those things that can be made a bit more idiomatic in the iterable paradigm, probably by just handing control of generation of output over to another generator whose argument is the match.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@conartist6