From e273bcce54d9bb7d0ea1af96c67418d7ef369f86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 16:59:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 01/20] Update faq.yml Added English translation #600 --- _data/faq.yml | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 163a26ce5ce8..438b8a4df246 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ it: answer: | I soggetti destinatari delle disposizioni degli artt. 68 e 69 del CAD sono le pubbliche amministrazioni di cui all’art. 1, comma 2, del decreto - legislativo 30 marzo 2001, n. 165, nel rispetto del riparto di competenza + legislativo 30 marzo 2001, n. 165, nel rispetto del reparto di competenza di cui all’art. 117 della Costituzione; tra queste, si annoverano gli istituti e scuole di ogni ordine e grado e le istituzioni educative. Il combinato disposto degli artt. 68 e 69 del CAD non opera alcuna @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ it: Chiunque può segnalare presunte violazioni delle disposizioni del CAD, tra cui quelle ex artt. 68 e 69, accedendo all’apposita area - dedicata presente sul sito dell’AgID + dedicata presente sul sito dell’AgID. item8: question: Quali sanzioni potrebbero essere comminate ad una PA qualora acquisisca soluzioni, programmi informatici senza effettuare la valutazione @@ -122,3 +122,121 @@ it: finestra temporale considerata è di 60 giorni. en: + item1: + question: Do articles 68 and 69 of the CAD apply to public schools for + the acquisition and reuse of software, be it software + for teaching or software for administrative purposes? + answer: | + Recipients of the provisions of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD + are the public administrations referred to in art. 1, paragraph 2, of the legislative decree + March 30, 2001, n. 165, in respect of the division of competence + of art. 117 of the Constitution; among these, there are the + institutes and schools of all levels and educational institutions. + The combined provisions of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD do not operate any + distinction about the type of purpose of a software. The object + of the obligation established by the above mentioned provisions is the software of + ownership of public administration. + item2: + question: In which cases is the PA considered owner of a software? + answer: | + The administration must be considered owner of a software realized on + its own specific indications every time: + + item3: + question: Do articles 68 and 69 of CAD apply before any software procurement? + answer: | + Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD apply in any case of solutions acquisition by + a PA, software or parts of it + regardless of the type of procedure. + For more information about CAD see this + link. + item4: + question: Can non-open source software owned by a PA be put to Reuse? + answer: | + It is necessary to distinguish between software requested and specifically developed + for a Public Administration (or developed within it) + and software of commercial nature of which an administration has instead + acquired a use right license. Only the software belonging to the first category + is subject to art. 69 of the CAD on reuse: for such solutions + administrations must obligatorily acquire full ownership of the + source code and must proceed with its release in open source. Instead the commercial + software acquired by means of a use right license can not be put to reuse. + item5: + question: Which are the indications provided for the purposes of compliance + of art. 69 regarding the choice of the license? + answer: | + The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public + administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69 + of the CAD, foresee that the choice of the license by a PA is + made by choosing a license among those certified by Open Source + Initiatives. For more information about licensing see this + resource. + item6: + question: Is it possible in the process of Reuse of a solution + apply, by virtue of the principle of compatibility of licenses, to the work + derived a different license from the original work? + answer: | + The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public + administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69 + CAD, define, in paragraph 3.5.3, the decision tree for the + choice of an open license; in particular, if the release of the software + refers to a modification of existing open source software (so + taken for reuse by other administrations or owned by third parties) + the administration must use the same license with which the software has been + originally distributed, in order to facilitate its maximum + interoperability and reuse with other users of the same software. + item7: + Question: To which authorities can be reported the + non-application by a PA of articles 68 and 69 of CAD? + answer: | + According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the Office + of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting + all reports of supposed violations of the Code + of the Digital Administration, or any other rule on the subject of + digitization and innovation, to guarantee the digital rights of the + citizens and businesses. + Anyone can report supposed violations of CAD provisions, + among which those ex art. 68 and 69, accessing the appropriate area + dedicated on AgID website. + item8: + question: What fines could be imposed at a PA that + acquires solutions, without making a + technical and economic comparison? + answer: | + The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards + the provisions concerning the acquisition of software may arise + management and disciplinary responsibility profiles + without prejudice to any liability for damages treasury. + item9: + question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not + proceed to the release in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? + answer: | + The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to possible + profiles of managerial and disciplinary responsibility, the neglected + reuse release of software solutions prevents others + administrations to proceed to the relative evaluation and acquisition in + reuse, thus configuring a possible liability for tax damage. + item10: + question: How is the displayed vitality index for each + software calculated? + answer: | + The vitality index (vitality index), as expected by the + + guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public sector + administrations indicates the degree of activity carried out in the last time span + on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth explanation of the parameters + used to make the calculation is present in + this page. This index is calculated every night and, currently, the + time window considered is 60 days. + From aa4784425b03f19980d66114e57504766eef52c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:56:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 02/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 438b8a4df246..a4565d041f68 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ en: From 8aaf676e9240f36bba0e4715f47f18157f7e608f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:56:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 03/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index a4565d041f68..7c76f1136a74 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ en: question: Do articles 68 and 69 of CAD apply before any software procurement? answer: | Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD apply in any case of solutions acquisition by - a PA, software or parts of it + a Public Administration, software or parts of it regardless of the type of procedure. For more information about CAD see this From bae2239f3543d36bd2d37e96d3f34a04ce8bb83f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:56:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 04/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 7c76f1136a74..d1aaba0d0416 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ en: It is necessary to distinguish between software requested and specifically developed for a Public Administration (or developed within it) and software of commercial nature of which an administration has instead - acquired a use right license. Only the software belonging to the first category + acquired a right of use license. Only the software belonging to the first category is subject to art. 69 of the CAD on reuse: for such solutions administrations must obligatorily acquire full ownership of the source code and must proceed with its release in open source. Instead the commercial From 078d1a02eaf0a2e74985eb8943bc3216f493751e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:57:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 05/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index d1aaba0d0416..7d65f8eb1bc4 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ en: The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD, foresee that the choice of the license by a PA is - made by choosing a license among those certified by Open Source + made by choosing a license among those certified by the Open Source Initiatives. For more information about licensing see this resource. From 364c416d7c798ab202ab282b5f4efe68ab39fc14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:57:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 06/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 7d65f8eb1bc4..18b5a16929b3 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ en: of the CAD, foresee that the choice of the license by a PA is made by choosing a license among those certified by the Open Source Initiatives. For more information about licensing see this + href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/gl-acquisition-and-reuse-software-for-pa-docs/en/stabile/software-reuse/open-licences-and-selecting-a-licence.html#choosing-a-licence">this resource. item6: question: Is it possible in the process of Reuse of a solution From 070faf893efb48b22506068a532b1e71310510d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:57:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 07/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 18b5a16929b3..1b11da6dfe2b 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ en: answer: | The vitality index (vitality index), as expected by the + href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/gl-acquisition-and-reuse-software-for-pa-docs/en/stabile/software-acquisition/macro-phase-2-Analysis-of-reusable-PA-solutions-and-open-source-solutions.html#phase-2-2-assessment-of-reusable-solutions-for-the-pa"> guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public sector administrations indicates the degree of activity carried out in the last time span on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth explanation of the parameters From 83b5d3d2909926f6727baf723ba0c0eded9c3e7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:57:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 08/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 1b11da6dfe2b..bac9c31ed11e 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ en: administrations indicates the degree of activity carried out in the last time span on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth explanation of the parameters used to make the calculation is present in + href="https://github.com/italia/developers-italia-backend/blob/master/docs/vitalityIndex.md"> this page. This index is calculated every night and, currently, the time window considered is 60 days. From 6d44a1dc2099b9725c6adbf33341f41db1722809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 23:05:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 09/20] Update faq.yml --- _data/faq.yml | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index bac9c31ed11e..cb46e4c6453c 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ it: href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/lg-acquisizione-e-riuso-software-per-pa-docs/it/stabile/acquisizione-software/macro-fase-2-analisi-delle-soluzioni-a-riuso-delle-pa-e-delle-soluzioni-open-source.html#fase-2-2-valutazione-soluzioni-riusabili-per-la-pa"> linee guida su acquisizione e riuso di software per le pubbliche amministrazioni indica il grado di attività svolta nell'ultimo arco - temporale su ogni repository indicizzato in catalogo. Una spiegazione approfondita dei parametri - utilizzati per effettuare il calcolo è presente in questa pagina. Questo indice è calcolato ogni notte e, attualmente, la finestra temporale considerata è di 60 giorni. @@ -128,13 +128,13 @@ en: for teaching or software for administrative purposes? answer: | Recipients of the provisions of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD - are the public administrations referred to in art. 1, paragraph 2, of the legislative decree - March 30, 2001, n. 165, in respect of the division of competence - of art. 117 of the Constitution; among these, there are the + are the public administrations referred to in art. 1, paragraph 2, of the + legislative decree March 30, 2001, n. 165, in respect of the division of + competence of art. 117 of the Constitution; among these, there are the institutes and schools of all levels and educational institutions. The combined provisions of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD do not operate any - distinction about the type of purpose of a software. The object - of the obligation established by the above mentioned provisions is the software of + distinction about the type of purpose of a software. The object of the + obligation established by the above mentioned provisions is the software of ownership of public administration. item2: question: In which cases is the PA considered owner of a software? @@ -143,9 +143,10 @@ en: its own specific indications every time:
  • it commissioned the solution, through a procurement contract - or other negotiating circumstances, and the contract foresees the acquisition of all intellectual and industrial property rights - on the software developed on its client's behalf or in any case it does not attribute - such ownership by the contractor or third parties;
    • . + or other negotiating circumstances, and the contract foresees the acquisition + of all intellectual and industrial property rights + on the software developed on its client's behalf or in any case it does not + attribute such ownership by the contractor or third parties;.
  • the software has been realized by internal resources of the administration.
item3: @@ -160,13 +161,13 @@ en: item4: question: Can non-open source software owned by a PA be put to Reuse? answer: | - It is necessary to distinguish between software requested and specifically developed - for a Public Administration (or developed within it) + It is necessary to distinguish between software requested and specifically + developed for a Public Administration (or developed within it) and software of commercial nature of which an administration has instead - acquired a right of use license. Only the software belonging to the first category - is subject to art. 69 of the CAD on reuse: for such solutions - administrations must obligatorily acquire full ownership of the - source code and must proceed with its release in open source. Instead the commercial + acquired a right of use license. Only the software belonging to the first + category is subject to art. 69 of the CAD on reuse: for such solutions + administrations must obligatorily acquire full ownership of the source code + and must proceed with its release in open source. Instead the commercial software acquired by means of a use right license can not be put to reuse. item5: question: Which are the indications provided for the purposes of compliance @@ -190,39 +191,37 @@ en: choice of an open license; in particular, if the release of the software refers to a modification of existing open source software (so taken for reuse by other administrations or owned by third parties) - the administration must use the same license with which the software has been - originally distributed, in order to facilitate its maximum + the administration must use the same license with which the software has + been originally distributed, in order to facilitate its maximum interoperability and reuse with other users of the same software. item7: Question: To which authorities can be reported the non-application by a PA of articles 68 and 69 of CAD? answer: | - According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the Office - of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting - all reports of supposed violations of the Code - of the Digital Administration, or any other rule on the subject of - digitization and innovation, to guarantee the digital rights of the - citizens and businesses. + According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the + Office of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting all reports + of supposed violations of the Code of the Digital Administration, or any + other rule on the subject of digitization and innovation, to guarantee + the digital rights of the citizens and businesses. Anyone can report supposed violations of CAD provisions, among which those ex art. 68 and 69, accessing the appropriate area dedicated on AgID website. item8: - question: What fines could be imposed at a PA that - acquires solutions, without making a - technical and economic comparison? - answer: | - The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards - the provisions concerning the acquisition of software may arise - management and disciplinary responsibility profiles - without prejudice to any liability for damages treasury. + question: What fines could be imposed at a PA that acquires solutions, + without making a technical and economic comparison? + answer: | + The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards the + provisions concerning the acquisition of software may arise management + and disciplinary responsibility profiles without prejudice to any + liability for damages treasury. item9: - question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not - proceed to the release in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? + question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not proceed to the release + in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? answer: | - The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to possible - profiles of managerial and disciplinary responsibility, the neglected - reuse release of software solutions prevents others + The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to + possible profiles of managerial and disciplinary responsibility, + the neglected reuse release of software solutions prevents others administrations to proceed to the relative evaluation and acquisition in reuse, thus configuring a possible liability for tax damage. item10: @@ -233,9 +232,9 @@ en: guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public sector - administrations indicates the degree of activity carried out in the last time span - on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth explanation of the parameters - used to make the calculation is present in indicates the degree of activity carried out in the + last time span on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth + explanation of the parameters used to make the calculation is present in this page. This index is calculated every night and, currently, the time window considered is 60 days. From b02891501907a4f507023a7b7c42fa6d8fc25e1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:56:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 10/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index cb46e4c6453c..dd39556fc3d7 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ en: liability for damages treasury. item9: question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not proceed to the release - in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? + in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? answer: | The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to possible profiles of managerial and disciplinary responsibility, From b03ca348b571b4b4f5bdec2b444acae86ad60e60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:07:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 11/20] Update formatting in _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index dd39556fc3d7..ca25a0cf3715 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ en: interoperability and reuse with other users of the same software. item7: Question: To which authorities can be reported the - non-application by a PA of articles 68 and 69 of CAD? answer: | According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the Office of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting all reports From 3bd4e6128e7dca20842236b51cef1050ca11a7c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:07:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 12/20] Update formatting in _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index ca25a0cf3715..2f0d69ed8a99 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ en: been originally distributed, in order to facilitate its maximum interoperability and reuse with other users of the same software. item7: - Question: To which authorities can be reported the + Question: How can I report the non-application of articles 68 and 69 of the CAD? answer: | According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the Office of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting all reports From fa017bdbbafbf3d99cd130af8a77f4dd82909cdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:56:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 13/20] Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 2f0d69ed8a99..9271e869ffab 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ en: been originally distributed, in order to facilitate its maximum interoperability and reuse with other users of the same software. item7: - Question: How can I report the non-application of articles 68 and 69 of the CAD? + question: How can I report the non-application of articles 68 and 69 of the CAD? answer: | According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the Office of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting all reports @@ -204,8 +204,8 @@ en: the digital rights of the citizens and businesses. Anyone can report supposed violations of CAD provisions, among which those ex art. 68 and 69, accessing the appropriate area - dedicated on AgID website. + href="https://difensorecivicodigitale.gov.it/index.php?a=add">dedicated + area(in Italian) on the AgID website. item8: question: What fines could be imposed at a PA that acquires solutions, without making a technical and economic comparison? From d9b1fd165f89fcd39ad2266c2abd1ac925d69f4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:06:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 14/20] Updated "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse..." --- _data/faq.yml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 9271e869ffab..83af66e2a74f 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ en: question: Which are the indications provided for the purposes of compliance of art. 69 regarding the choice of the license? answer: | - The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public + The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for public administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69 of the CAD, foresee that the choice of the license by a PA is made by choosing a license among those certified by the Open Source @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ en: apply, by virtue of the principle of compatibility of licenses, to the work derived a different license from the original work? answer: | - The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public + The "Guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for public administrations", adopted by AgID in implementation of Articles 68 and 69 CAD, define, in paragraph 3.5.3, the decision tree for the choice of an open license; in particular, if the release of the software @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ en: The vitality index (vitality index), as expected by the - guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for the public sector + guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for public administrations indicates the degree of activity carried out in the last time span on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth explanation of the parameters used to make the calculation is present in Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:10:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 15/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 83af66e2a74f..6580838299ea 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ en: href="https://docs.italia.it/italia/developers-italia/gl-acquisition-and-reuse-software-for-pa-docs/en/stabile/software-acquisition/macro-phase-2-Analysis-of-reusable-PA-solutions-and-open-source-solutions.html#phase-2-2-assessment-of-reusable-solutions-for-the-pa"> guidelines on the acquisition and reuse of software for public administrations indicates the degree of activity carried out in the - last time span on each indexed repository in the catalog. An in-depth + last time span on each repository in the catalog. An in-depth explanation of the parameters used to make the calculation is present in this page. This index is calculated every night and, currently, the From d84fb8119ea1c39340f32ed295a5b20fd9f1420e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:28:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 16/20] Faq 8 updated --- _data/faq.yml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 6580838299ea..ec4f7b9d9d07 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -211,9 +211,9 @@ en: without making a technical and economic comparison? answer: | The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards the - provisions concerning the acquisition of software may arise management - and disciplinary responsibility profiles without prejudice to any - liability for damages treasury. + provisions concerning the acquisition of software, management + and disciplinary responsibility profiles may arise as well as possible + liability for damage to the treasury. item9: question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not proceed to the release in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? From e8a55e23028f3be00ac6a148272ff7955d39a2fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:29:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 17/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index ec4f7b9d9d07..4c2b3ea8ec23 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ en: and disciplinary responsibility profiles may arise as well as possible liability for damage to the treasury. item9: - question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it not proceed to the release + question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it does not release in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? answer: | The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to From 631fbccf79f04ab2c05bd5f7e46d4eda10fe9602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 12:16:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 18/20] Faq 9 updated --- _data/faq.yml | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 4c2b3ea8ec23..296d01deaff5 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -218,11 +218,12 @@ en: question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it does not release in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? answer: | - The CAD does not provide for direct fines; however, without prejudice to - possible profiles of managerial and disciplinary responsibility, - the neglected reuse release of software solutions prevents others - administrations to proceed to the relative evaluation and acquisition in - reuse, thus configuring a possible liability for tax damage. + The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards the + provisions concerning the acquisition of software, management + and disciplinary responsibility profiles may arise, the failure to release + the software solutions for reuse prevents other administrations to proceed + with the relative evaluation and acquisition for reuse, thus configuring a + possible liability for damage to the treasury. item10: question: How is the displayed vitality index for each software calculated? From 0f1b6fc71e19a23f844fe40b7da63ff89a40d5cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 12:17:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 19/20] Update _data/faq.yml Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 296d01deaff5..42cef1c4baea 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ en: liability for damage to the treasury. item9: question: What fines could be imposed to a PA if it does not release - in open source of the software developed or commissioned by it? + in open source the software developed or commissioned by it? answer: | The CAD does not provide direct fines; however, if a PA disregards the provisions concerning the acquisition of software, management From 6e18b9b2e1dc08ae2e5d68325cccde267b21fce9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mzzntn <37122612+mzzntn@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:46:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 20/20] Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: libremente --- _data/faq.yml | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/_data/faq.yml b/_data/faq.yml index 42cef1c4baea..78d3c8cfacd7 100644 --- a/_data/faq.yml +++ b/_data/faq.yml @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ it: en: item1: - question: Do articles 68 and 69 of the CAD apply to public schools for + question: Do articles 68 and 69 of the CAD (Digital Administration Code) apply to public schools for the acquisition and reuse of software, be it software for teaching or software for administrative purposes? answer: | @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ en: or other negotiating circumstances, and the contract foresees the acquisition of all intellectual and industrial property rights on the software developed on its client's behalf or in any case it does not - attribute such ownership by the contractor or third parties;. + attribute such ownership by the contractor or third parties;
  • the software has been realized by internal resources of the administration.
    • item3: @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ en: category is subject to art. 69 of the CAD on reuse: for such solutions administrations must obligatorily acquire full ownership of the source code and must proceed with its release in open source. Instead the commercial - software acquired by means of a use right license can not be put to reuse. + software acquired by means of a right of use license can not be put to reuse. item5: question: Which are the indications provided for the purposes of compliance of art. 69 regarding the choice of the license? @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ en: answer: | According to art. 17, paragraph 1-quater is established by the AgID the Office of the Digital Ombudsman who has the task of collecting all reports - of supposed violations of the Code of the Digital Administration, or any + of supposed violations of the Digital Administration Code, or any other rule on the subject of digitization and innovation, to guarantee the digital rights of the citizens and businesses. Anyone can report supposed violations of CAD provisions,