-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
transient EPERM errors on Windows #303
Comments
I think falling back to moveRemove right away is the better approach. Retrying for 4 seconds is pretty brutal, and if it's just single files here and there, then moveRemove wouldn't be too terrible. |
@lukekarrys do you have a fork of this with the proposed patches applied to see the perf difference, by chance? |
I have a PR open in my fork where I am experimenting with fixing the EPERM errors but I haven't checked out performance there yet: lukekarrys#1 |
I also have #320 which allows for filtering and comparing benchmarks. But I haven't tried to get any definitive results yet since I switched over to trying another method to fix the EPERM errors. |
I always reach for
rimraf
when I hit Windows specific filesystem errors. This eliminates them and then I don't have to think about Windows specific filesystem errors.I recently hit a case that rimraf didn't fix. When trying to remove a 25mb exe file on CI in Windows, I would get
EPERM
errors that rimraf would eventually throw on. I eventually found two work arounds:rimraf.moveRemove
directlyI think both of those fixes could be applied in rimraf but I'm not sure which would be safer for general use. Having looked at the code I think the options would be:
EPERM
to the list of retryable busy codes inrimraf/src/retry-busy.ts
Line 8 in d2fa213
EPERM
instead of onlyENOTEMPTY
inrimraf/src/rimraf-windows.ts
Line 41 in d2fa213
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: