You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given there are PRs dating as far back as 2014, I'm not sure if O'Neill ( @imneme ) is actively managing this project anymore let alone prepping it for standardization.
I'm not averse to it, although overall I think it would be good not to push for PCG specifically, but for more high-quality PRNGs in general and better support for users.
Related, there was a push back in 2015 to get randutils adopted, but folks involved with the standard were very anti-class at the time, so didn't like the fact that it used classes.
Any plan of proposing the PCG RNG to the C++ standard committee? The current RNGs in C++ are slow: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: