You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just wanted to suggest the addition of an optional results column with the name of the input image and the name of the label map (similar to Display label in Analyze › Set Measurements...) in MorphoLibJ › Analyze › Intensity Measurements 2D/3D.
Same for the name of the label map when using MorphoLibJ › Analyze › Analyze Regions.
Also, if the names of the input images are present in the results then the ability of adding new results to an existing table (rather than creating a new one) might be useful.
This would help users process the results when analysing multiple images.
Thanks a lot
🙇
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
yes, this coud be a useful option!
I plan (for a long time...) to refactor these plugin, so this can be taken into account.
however I am not totally sure this can be easily done. From what I remember, ImageJ ResultsTable allow only numeric values, and adding names is possible only in the first column :(
But maybe it is possible to provide a pattern for combining image name and label value to populate first column...
Hi @dlegland 👋
I just wanted to suggest the addition of an optional results column with the name of the input image and the name of the label map (similar to
Display label
inAnalyze › Set Measurements...
) inMorphoLibJ › Analyze › Intensity Measurements 2D/3D
.Same for the name of the label map when using
MorphoLibJ › Analyze › Analyze Regions
.Also, if the names of the input images are present in the results then the ability of adding new results to an existing table (rather than creating a new one) might be useful.
This would help users process the results when analysing multiple images.
Thanks a lot
🙇
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: