Skip to content

Changing GAMS solver in message-ix Python API #794

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

If we inspect the MESSAGE GAMS source, we see these lines:

* solver comments for QCP and PATH:
* - GUROBI, CPLEX and MINOS are fast
* - CONOPT is slower, but (in non-linear problems) usually more helpful to identify the feasibility problems
* general comment: sometimes, first using one solver and then another (using the previous solution as starting point)
* helps even if the previous run did not solve to optimality
option LP = CPLEX ;

@Alaa-Eltablawy, as @glatterf42 says, you do seem to be providing this option to the Python API in a way that reaches the GAMS in…

Replies: 1 comment 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@khaeru
Comment options

Answer selected by glatterf42
@Alaa-Eltablawy
Comment options

@glatterf42
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Explaining features/usage; no code change needed
3 participants