Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add location of RITE data descriptions #2

Open
khaeru opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Add location of RITE data descriptions #2

khaeru opened this issue Jun 29, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@khaeru
Copy link
Member

khaeru commented Jun 29, 2021

@naoko-onishi @mnagashi will add this, as indicated on the “Assignees” in the sidebar →

This will involve opening a new pull request to modify the providers.yaml file. I can do this; or you can do this, with my support or the support of my colleague @LauWien.

The modifications should add one new entry, like this:

- id: jmip
contact:
name: JU Yiyi
email: [email protected]
github: yiyi1991
files:
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/UTokyo-mip/JMIP_dataset/JMIP2021_EDITS/description_EDITS.yaml

…but update:

  • the ID
  • the URL to your data description file—in another repository, or possibly in edits-data-common if you don't want to create a new repo.
  • the contact information, i.e. your names and e-mail addresses.
@khaeru
Copy link
Member Author

khaeru commented Jun 29, 2021

@mnagashi @naoko-onishi —can you please say which data set(s) or model(s) RITE plans to represent in data exchange (e.g. by providing data to others in EDITS, or requesting certain input data)?

@mnagashi
Copy link

We are thinking about providing some of the input or output data from the DNE21+ model to others in the EDITS, starting with the transport sector.

@naoko-onishi
Copy link

As Miyuki replied, we will provide the Transport related data once it's ready.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants