Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

There needs to be a common CBOR type for all proof types #19

Open
ad-l opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

There needs to be a common CBOR type for all proof types #19

ad-l opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ad-l
Copy link

ad-l commented Jul 11, 2023

In last week's Editor call, the assumption was that COSE_Sign1 was always the common type for any COMETRE proof type, but this is very ambiguous in the document. The terminology defines the proof type, proof value, and proof signature but then defines inclusion proofs and consistency proof without any commonality. For instance, the document never explictly says that all proof have a proof signature or introduce a common type for all proof types

@OR13 OR13 transferred this issue from ietf-scitt/draft-steele-cose-merkle-tree-proofs Sep 6, 2023
@OR13 OR13 transferred this issue from ietf-scitt/cose-merkle-tree-proofs Sep 6, 2023
@OR13 OR13 transferred this issue from ietf-scitt/draft-steele-cose-merkle-tree-proofs Sep 6, 2023
@OR13
Copy link
Collaborator

OR13 commented Sep 6, 2023

#20 (comment)

@ad-l ^ same comment on this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants