You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ned asserts that specific wording appears to conflict with other adopted drafts. E.g., Section 2.1 – Non-reputable Identity Evidence and subsequent use of ‘non-reputable’ in the context of identifying the Attester or an Attesting Environment. Given a DAA key as Attesting Environment identity, the objective is to allow reputable Attester instance identity but non-reputable Attester class identity. Eric responded that in DAA, perhaps the term DAA credential should be formally defined. What DAA says now is "Attestation Evidence SHOULD be cryptographically associated with an identity document that is a randomised DAA credential." Additionally, perhaps the "Attester Identity ('attesterIdentity')" principle in Section 5 should be refined to "Anonymous Attester Identity"? In any case, DAA seems to have a more narrow definition of identity than draft-voit-rats-attestation-results. In this draft, the non-reputable class itself be considered a form of identity. So I think the intent of both sets of text don't conflict, even if we don't have all the terms right. Also draft-voit-rats-attestation-results could easily import terms like "Anonymous Attester Identity" from DAA as being a valid form of identity. Having the group being identified is quite useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ned asserts that specific wording appears to conflict with other adopted drafts. E.g., Section 2.1 – Non-reputable Identity Evidence and subsequent use of ‘non-reputable’ in the context of identifying the Attester or an Attesting Environment. Given a DAA key as Attesting Environment identity, the objective is to allow reputable Attester instance identity but non-reputable Attester class identity. Eric responded that in DAA, perhaps the term DAA credential should be formally defined. What DAA says now is "Attestation Evidence SHOULD be cryptographically associated with an identity document that is a randomised DAA credential." Additionally, perhaps the "Attester Identity ('attesterIdentity')" principle in Section 5 should be refined to "Anonymous Attester Identity"? In any case, DAA seems to have a more narrow definition of identity than draft-voit-rats-attestation-results. In this draft, the non-reputable class itself be considered a form of identity. So I think the intent of both sets of text don't conflict, even if we don't have all the terms right. Also draft-voit-rats-attestation-results could easily import terms like "Anonymous Attester Identity" from DAA as being a valid form of identity. Having the group being identified is quite useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: