Inappropriate penalty scope of slashed/reported FLIPs

[sekisanchi]

The Idena protocol around reported FLIP or slashing is to reject id/node itself against group/pool attack with shared informations. However, it is too much hard for solo participant, who is not familiar with story reading/writing with the heavy bias like casting - different person may forms the sequential story, or there may be some implied cliche/stereotype scenario.
So please consider partially narrowing the scope of penalty from node/id level to FLIP, so that the small FLIP negative votes does not affect other benefits.