Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add example filters #3

Open
NullVoxPopuli opened this issue Feb 5, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Add example filters #3

NullVoxPopuli opened this issue Feb 5, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link

Like, a common one:

1v1 ranked ladder

  • exclude unranked
  • exclude a.i.

Maybe also games where I've lost.

@icza
Copy link
Owner

icza commented Feb 5, 2016

To my knowledge, the info whether a replay is ranked or unranked is not stored in the replay. It might be possible to somehow deduce this info from data stored in the replay, but I haven't figured it out how.

The rest (filter for 1v1 ranked or unranked matches) is already possible: Replay filters, add 2 filters:

[Replay] Format = 1v1 AND [Replay] Game mode = AutoMM

It's also possible to include whether you (a specific player) lost or won, e.g.

[Player A] Toon = 'xxx' AND [Player A] Result = Defeat

@icza
Copy link
Owner

icza commented Feb 5, 2016

Reading again the issue title maybe that's not what I thought you want.

Do you mean built-in examples? That people can choose without having to construct the filters themselves?

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Author

yeah! build in, pre-made filters :-)

@icza
Copy link
Owner

icza commented Feb 5, 2016

But just as a side note... you know you can save filters once you've constructed them, right? And of course you can load saved filters...

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Author

yeah, I have a couple saved filters. But it took me a while to get them configured the way I want. the or/and logic dropdowns behave kinda funky / not what I'm used to

@icza
Copy link
Owner

icza commented Feb 5, 2016

Yeah, I know, because filters and grouping (parenthesis) are provided in a "linear" fashion (sequentially), but evaluating a series of AND / OR filters with grouping requires "hierarchical" representation. That's why there's a "Filters Structure Preview" which helps understanding what it means that you assembled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants