Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLexplainDifference and correction for overweight in boxes #198

Closed
KirstenBirchHaakansson opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@KirstenBirchHaakansson
Copy link
Collaborator

During the submission the CLscientificWeight was not multiplied with the factor we use for correction for overweight in boxes

The main reasoning being that it becomes rather nontransparent what we have done, when a lot of the lines ends up with a combination of reasons for the difference between the CLofficialWeight and CLscientificWeight

Related to
#184

@KirstenBirchHaakansson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We have discussed if we should include the calculation of the correction factor in the estimation and thereby document what we do in TAF instead of just adding it to the CLscientificWeight

Pros:

  1. We document what we do

Cons:

  1. We are not able to include the needed information in the present CS data model (maybe with some heavy thinking we would be able)
  2. scientific weight would differ between the CL and the output of estimation

@HenrikK-N
Copy link
Collaborator

It was briefly discussed but there was no conclusion.

@HenrikK-N
Copy link
Collaborator

The weight could be corrected for multiple reasons, which will not directly appear in the DifferentReason, but that level is not needed internationally. The codes in DifferentReason can be used for explaining the potential difference with not further details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants