FEAT: Format changes

[MariaMakri]

Some changes in the Fecundity and Atresia format have been requested from the Governance Group:

Currently, in the format, only the latest Oocyte stage present is noted. It was discussed that they would like to also report the presence or absence of previous stages (from 2 and above, since stage 1 is always present).

Therefore, they would like to add 4 new fields (yes or no fields)

OocyteStage2 (yes/no) Presence or absence of Oocyte Stage 2
OocyteStage3 (yes/no) Presence or absence of Oocyte Stage 3
OocyteStage4 (yes/no) Presence or absence of Oocyte Stage 4
OocyteStage5 (yes/no) Presence or absence of Oocyte Stage 5

Currently, in the Fecundity and Batch Fecundity record, we have the SampleWeight and SubsampleVol fields.

During sampling, 4 samples should be taken:

Sample A,B (25 ul)
Sample C,D (100 ul)

RECORD: FM-Fish Measurement
SubsampleVolA Volume (ul) of pipette subsample A
SubsampleVolB Volume (ul) of pipette subsample B
SubsampleVolC Volume (ul) of pipette subsample C
SubsampleVolD Volume (ul) of pipette subsample D

In order to have an overview of which sample has been used, they would like to add a field
SubsampleID, using values a,b,c,d.
SubSampleID ID (a, b, c or d) of the subsample used for fecundity or batch fecundity analysis

[MariaMakri]

After Liaising with Anna, there have been some concerns regarding these changes that we would like to take on the Q2 governance meeting:

1. Regarding the Presence of the Oocyte stages 2-5, would it, perhaps be more informative to add directly some intervals for an estimated amount of oocytes present (e.g 0-100=few, 101-200=abundant), so we would not add the yes/no field first and then review it?
2. Regarding the addition of Subsample volume in the fish measurement table:

• We agreed in the subgroup to add this in the FM record, since the pipette subsamples are being taken in that stage (on board).
  -Currently, in the fish measurement table, the ovary sample is described and the subsample taken is described in the fecundity data. So we might need to consider adding the new fields to the fecundity and atresia data table.

[MariaMakri]

The SubSampleID field has been added in the FD record (mandatory only for MEGS survey, accepted values are: a,b,c,d).

The following fields have been added to the HS table:
EarlyVitellogenicOocyteFlag
VitellogenicOocyteFlag
MigratoryNucleusOocyteFlag

the fields are mandatory and are added as yes or no fields.