-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Large 834 file parse #3
Comments
Great that you're using this parser @Lucier82 , many thanks! There were virtually no contributions in a long time, mainly due to the fact that it's stable and parsing standard formats is not an evolving field. On top of that EDI is increasingly replaced by xml and json. Since I hope this helps. |
I work in the health care industry and as far as I can tell, EDI isn't going anywhere any time soon (for me at least; i can't speak to other industries and companies). I appreciate this parser I commonly refer to as the "Peanut Butter" parser because for awhile I couldn't remember who pb stood for. Anyways... I am trying all the Thank you for the quick feedback, I wasn't certain I was going to get anyone due to the age of the project. I will update this issue when I get to some sort of resolution. |
@Lucier82 |
Update: I am using this project through Maven central, which was nice so I didn't have to import and manage the jar manually; |
So I did this again with the |
I'm not even sure if this project is being supported but I have recently started using this parser for my application and have found the parsing of large files to be time consuming and possibly error prone. In my case I have a 1GB 834 EDI file that is causing a heap space issue on my line of code:
this.x12 = (X12) parser.parse(this.content);
wherethis.content
represent a string containing the file data... I know this is probably the worst possible solution however; I'd like to know if parsing in this manner using an Input Stream of File object still utilizes the same memory consumption or if they use buffered readers to keep heap space usage lower?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: