Describes how parties using peer DIDs can notify one another that they are abandoning the connection.
We need a way to tell another party that we are abandoning the connection. This is not strictly required, but it is good hygiene.
This RFC defines the abandon_connection protocol, version 1.x, as identified by the
following PIURI:
https://didcomm.org/abandon_connection/1.0
Of course, subsequent evolutions of the protocol will replace 1.0 with
an appropriate update per semver
rules.
This is a classic one-step notification,
so it uses the predefined roles of notifier and notified.
No state changes during this protocol, although overarching state could change once it completes. Therefore no state machines are required.
This message is used to announce that a party is abandoning the relationship. In a self-sovereign paradigm, abandoning a relationship can be done unilaterally, and does not require formal announcement. Indeed, sometimes a formal announcement is impossible, if one of the parties is offline. So while using this message is encouraged and best practice, it is not mandatory.
An announce message from Alice to Bob looks like this:
{
"@type": "https://didcomm.org/abandon_connection/1.0/announce",
"@id": "c17147d2-ada6-4d3c-a489-dc1e1bf778ab"
}If Bob receives a message like this, he should assume that Alice no longer considers herself part of "us", and take appropriate action. This could include destroying data about Alice that he has accumulated over the course of their relationship, removing her peer DID and its public key(s) and endpoints from his wallet, and so forth. The nature of the relationship, the need for a historical audit trail, regulatory requirements, and many other factors may influence what's appropriate; the protocol simply requires that the message be understood to have permanent termination semantics.