Replies: 3 comments
-
I agree. Naming is important. It's also hard. Fun fact. About 20 years ago I was working on Mondrian, an implementation of the MDX (multi-dimensional expressions) language. It was easy to find examples until Acura launched an SUV of the same name. Also in my younger years, I played guitar in a number of bands. Choosing a name was always the hardest part. Some of the bands broke up before we managed to agree on a name. Morel has already been renamed once. It used to be smlj, which was very searchable but not very pronounceable, and didn't convey the emphasis on relational algebra. Maybe it will be renamed again. Or better still, someone will fork it and it will evolve into something better. (BCPL yielded B yielded C; Oak was evolved into Java.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If people get into the habit of using the tag "MorelLang", that wouldn't be a bad thing. GoLang has worked pretty well for Go. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This was originally an issue, but as there's nothing concrete we can do at this point, I converted it into a discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A (the?) key language name quality is, unique searchability.
Languages named helpfully for language learners and users (hello Stack Overflow):
Ambiguous names with previous and ongoing confusion, or too short to be unique:
Maybe not too late to consider a name more unique than Morel. It'd add possibilities like the use of Google Trends, and search of future references in academic papers
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions