Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address the possibility of differing task id variables in different groups #9

Open
elray1 opened this issue Nov 16, 2022 · 10 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@elray1
Copy link
Contributor

elray1 commented Nov 16, 2022

Suppose I try to define a task id config file that looks like this:

{
  "rounds": [
    {
      "round_id": "2021-03-07",
      "model_tasks": [
        {
          "task_ids": {
            "origin_date": {
              "required": ["2022-03-07"],
              "optional": null
            },
            "scenario_id": {
              "required": ["A-2021-03-05", "B-2021-03-05"],
              "optional": null
            },
            "location": {
              "required": null,
              "optional": {"$ref": "#/$defs/task_ids/location/us_all"}
            }
          },
          "output_types": { ... }
        },
        {
          "task_ids": {
            "origin_date": {
              "required": ["2022-03-07"],
              "optional": null
            },
             "scenario_id": {
              "required": ["C-2021-03-05", "D-2021-03-05"],
              "optional": null
            },
            "location": {
              "required": null,
              "optional": {"$ref": "#/$defs/task_ids/location/us_all"}
            }
            "age_group": {
              "required": null,
              "optional": ["0-5", "6-17", "18-65", "65-130"]
            }
          },
          "output_types": { ... }
        }
      ],
      "submissions_due": {
        "start": "2021-03-09",
        "end": "2021-04-09"
      }
    }
  ]
}

The set up is that there are two groups of tasks, one related to scenarios A and B and a second related to scenarios C and D. For scenarios C and D, age_group is relevant, but it is not relevant for scenarios A and B.

My questions are:

  1. Is there any reason to allow this kind of behavior? Or should we enforce that within each round, the same task id variables occur in all task groups?
  2. If we do allow it, what are we expecting to be in submission files? This should be documented.
@elray1
Copy link
Contributor Author

elray1 commented Nov 17, 2022

If round_id_from_variable = true then we certainly need to require that the round_id variable appears in all task groups.

@nickreich
Copy link

My preference for now would not be to engineer specifically for the scenario where tasks are different by scenario.

I think we could essentially allow teams to work around this by having, in your example age_group be a set of non-required categories, of which some are relevant to scenarios A and B and one ("all ages" or something like that) is relevant to C and D.

@elray1
Copy link
Contributor Author

elray1 commented Nov 21, 2022

I think heading in a similar direction as @nickreich, but with a different proposal -- what if we engineer so as to explicitly not to allow for a different set of task id variables in different task id groups within the same round? i.e., in an example like this, the hub would be required to add an age_group id variable to the task id group defining settings for scenarios A and B?

@nickreich
Copy link

image

@annakrystalli
Copy link
Member

Open issue in hubUtils to check programmatically that all unique task_ids are present in all model_task sets within a round

@annakrystalli
Copy link
Member

Quick question @nickreich & @elray1 , have we agreed that task_id groups in a given round must share the same task_ids or can we assume that if one is missing it should be:

  1. "all" or
  2. NA

@nickreich
Copy link

I'm ok with @elray1 's suggestion to enforce that all task_id variables in different task_id groups within the round be identical. Therefore, there is no "inferring" of a missing values of task_ids that are specified in one group but not another.

@elray1
Copy link
Contributor Author

elray1 commented Jul 12, 2023

@annakrystalli can this issue be closed, or should we open a related issue in hubUtils?

@annakrystalli
Copy link
Member

I think it's been addressed but I'll ship to hubUtils to investigate and confirm. 👍

@annakrystalli annakrystalli transferred this issue from hubverse-org/schemas Jul 12, 2023
@annakrystalli annakrystalli transferred this issue from hubverse-org/hubUtils Feb 29, 2024
@nickreich
Copy link

I think maybe this can be closed? but am going to ask @annakrystalli to confirm at some point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants