-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Address the possibility of differing task id variables in different groups #9
Comments
If |
My preference for now would not be to engineer specifically for the scenario where tasks are different by scenario. I think we could essentially allow teams to work around this by having, in your example age_group be a set of non-required categories, of which some are relevant to scenarios A and B and one ("all ages" or something like that) is relevant to C and D. |
I think heading in a similar direction as @nickreich, but with a different proposal -- what if we engineer so as to explicitly not to allow for a different set of task id variables in different task id groups within the same round? i.e., in an example like this, the hub would be required to add an |
Open issue in |
Quick question @nickreich & @elray1 , have we agreed that task_id groups in a given round must share the same task_ids or can we assume that if one is missing it should be:
|
I'm ok with @elray1 's suggestion to enforce that all task_id variables in different task_id groups within the round be identical. Therefore, there is no "inferring" of a missing values of task_ids that are specified in one group but not another. |
@annakrystalli can this issue be closed, or should we open a related issue in hubUtils? |
I think it's been addressed but I'll ship to |
I think maybe this can be closed? but am going to ask @annakrystalli to confirm at some point. |
Suppose I try to define a task id config file that looks like this:
The set up is that there are two groups of tasks, one related to scenarios A and B and a second related to scenarios C and D. For scenarios C and D,
age_group
is relevant, but it is not relevant for scenarios A and B.My questions are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: