You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear developers of VASPsol,
I am doing some research about the explicit/implicit solvent model with VASPsol code, in which I build a slab with 1 or 2 layers of explicit ice-like water above it. I have tried to modify the parameter NC_K with the purpose to make sure the counter-ion would not seep into the explicit molecules region. However, I find that the Fermi energy will dramatically change with the variation of the value of NC_K, as follows:
e.g (NC_K, E-fermi, Vaccum level)
(2.5E-5, -5.7899, -0.368)
(2.5E-4, -5.4576, -0.369)
(2.5E-6, -4.9104, -0.368)
This is a puzzle, I wonder if the variation of Fermi energy is reasonable and how can I obtain the correct PZC by adjusting NC_K
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ZhuoyangXie
changed the title
Fermi energy change with the value of parameter NC_K
Fermi energy changes with the value of parameter NC_K
Nov 8, 2023
Dear developers of VASPsol,
I am doing some research about the explicit/implicit solvent model with VASPsol code, in which I build a slab with 1 or 2 layers of explicit ice-like water above it. I have tried to modify the parameter NC_K with the purpose to make sure the counter-ion would not seep into the explicit molecules region. However, I find that the Fermi energy will dramatically change with the variation of the value of NC_K, as follows:
e.g (NC_K, E-fermi, Vaccum level)
(2.5E-5, -5.7899, -0.368)
(2.5E-4, -5.4576, -0.369)
(2.5E-6, -4.9104, -0.368)
This is a puzzle, I wonder if the variation of Fermi energy is reasonable and how can I obtain the correct PZC by adjusting NC_K
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: