Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug:ignore_nodes seems to be ignored as "Rebalanced Node" #102

Open
crandler opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Bug:ignore_nodes seems to be ignored as "Rebalanced Node" #102

crandler opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@crandler
Copy link

crandler commented Oct 14, 2024

General

VMs are migrated to nodes though listed in .conf: [vm_balancing] ignore_nodes.

Weighting

Score: 5

Config

[proxmox]
api_host: ************
api_user: ************
api_pass: ************
verify_ssl: *

[vm_balancing]
enable: 1
#method: memory
method: cpu
mode: used
mode_option: percent
type: vm
balanciness: 10
parallel_migrations: 1
ignore_nodes: pve-0830-01,pve-0830-02
ignore_vms: pbs-*

[storage_balancing]
enable: 0

[update_service]
enable: 0

[api]
enable: 0

[service]
daemon: 0
schedule: 24
log_verbosity: CRITICAL
config_version: 3

Log

Debug not possible: <2> ProxLB: Error: [config]: Config option log_verbosity is incorrect: DEBUG
Info:
ProxLB: Info: [node-statistics]: Added node pve-0830-02.
ProxLB: Info: [node-statistics]: Ignore Node: pve-0830-02 is set to be ignored.
[get-most-free-resources-nodes]: ('pve-0830-02', ...
[rebalancing-resource-statistics-update]: Moving vm-**** from pve-0928-01 to pve-0830-02

Meta

ProxLB version 1.0.4

Version: ProxLB version 1.0.4
Installed from: git clone https://github.com/gyptazy/ProxLB.git
Running as: local on Proxmox

@crandler crandler added bug Something isn't working needs-analysis labels Oct 14, 2024
@gyptazy gyptazy self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@gyptazy
Copy link
Owner

gyptazy commented Oct 14, 2024

Hey @crandler,

confirmed! Thanks for reporting!
Will fix that asap!

cheers,
gyptazy

@firth
Copy link

firth commented Nov 1, 2024

Still happens in version 1.0.5

@gyptazy
Copy link
Owner

gyptazy commented Nov 1, 2024

Hey @firth

Still happens in version 1.0.5

yep, the target fix is defined for R 1.0.6 (see above's message) and also why this issue is still open :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants