Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Radar 26 #348

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this issue Sep 28, 2015 · 27 comments
Closed

Radar 26 #348

chadwhitacre opened this issue Sep 28, 2015 · 27 comments

Comments

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

What are you working on this week and why?

last week

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Roadmap (what?)

Next Two Weeks

Alright, we're down to it:

Longer Term

roadmap

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Queues (what?)

Open Closed Queue Description
0 23 Violations private communication amongst the safety team
9 12 Security private communication with security researchers
5 25 Legal private communication with our counsel
11 898 Support private communication with users
1 108 L2 Support escalated support issues
11 60 Team Review public review of applications for new teams
? ? Errors production errors
0 1,718 Vendors, etc. private communication with our vendors
(also includes low-volume mailboxes: safety and security)
21 115 Pivot a milestone
16 47 Balanced Shutdown a milestone
7 9 Milestones all milestones
3 515 PR Review work in the final stage before deployment
21 1,661 PRs all work in progress
768 4,453 Issues public communication with contributors

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Brain dump:

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

There is a chance to present Gratipay at #346 - the choice lies between service concept, or a story about Gittip crisis can be told there.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Inbox 8, GitHub 5.

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 28, 2015

We should use these things as ways to improve communication about what Gratipay is and who it is for: http://arrdem.com/2015/09/28/thoughts_on_gratipay/. Not to argue about the philosophy (which is still radical), but about rules for joining and how it works.

Via https://twitter.com/arrdem/status/648307482138247168

Also, team review time seems to be an issue for some people.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Inbox 4, GitHub 0.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lunch 0, Coffee 0. I'm thinking of replying to arrdem's post on gratipay/project-review#65.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, team review time seems to be an issue for some people.

Link[s]?

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm thinking of replying to arrdem's post on gratipay/project-review#65.

Done: gratipay/project-review#65 (comment).

Alright, Balanced-in-Xero, look out ... 🏊

@kzisme
Copy link

kzisme commented Sep 29, 2015

Also on Twitter today this was sent in. I'm not sure which team or what/how he was viewing it from.

Any ideas or has this been reported previously?

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 29, 2015

Doesn't look familiar. I think it has to do with the math for charging in arrears, which isn't well-documented (gratipay/gratipay.com#3791).

That twitter account isn't attached to any Gratipay accounts (https://gratipay.com/search), so you might as well ask him.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Widgets are a mess right now. :-(

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 29, 2015

Oh, that's right, it's a widget. Hm.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Inbox 4, GitHub 0.

Diving back in on #308 to balance our books, and then over to gratipay/gratipay.com#3763 to start generating the list of people to refund for advances (gratipay/gratipay.com#3539 after that for 1.0 refunds).

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm -1 on retweeting accounts with "porn" in their username, because I see Gratipay as more clean-cut than that. Thoughts, @kzisme @mattbk @tshepang?

@kzisme
Copy link

kzisme commented Oct 1, 2015

I see where you're coming from and completley understand. I figured it was more good marketing than bad since it was obviously not porn, but at a glance it could be mistaken.

The general idea I had was to retweet since more eyes would see it along with our competitors.

I'll remove that now.

Also someone just retweeted a tweet from April...here that is...I was surprised and confused by that.

@kzisme
Copy link

kzisme commented Oct 1, 2015

Any other things to be sent out in the remainder of this week? Teams I can focus on or things of that nature? I've been busy so I apologize for my lack of involvement.

@kzisme
Copy link

kzisme commented Oct 1, 2015

Also....

!m @kaguillera @whit537 on knocking out #308 :) great work

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @kzisme. :-)

Re: April retweet, see: #319 (comment). ;-)

Today is the last day to apply for payouts. Probably worth talking about that some more?

@lzys
Copy link

lzys commented Oct 1, 2015

Hi @whit537 just uploaded coinvest application. The to do list is still in a making though. Is that alright?
Thx

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Oct 1, 2015

https://gratipay.com/dashboard/ looks clear of new 1.0 payout applications.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @lzys! Thanks for the application! Will check it out ...

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattbk Cool. I spent the morning on another draft for #319 (as you've seen), and now I'm going to run payday (#362) and then do the refunds (gratipay/gratipay.com#3763).

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Quick! Go get a https://www.yubico.com/github-special-offer/! 😱

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2015
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Email (what?)

screen shot 2015-10-14 at 12 51 21 pm

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants