-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding k6-browser support to runner image #289
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Paul Balogh <[email protected]>
@yorugac, building upon our Slack convo today, I successfully ran k6-browser tests using the operator. There remains a separate issue where only This PR is more of an FYI (experiment)...I'm not sure if we truly want to merge this just yet. |
Related PR for Docker k6-browser image: grafana/k6#3340 @javaducky, IIUC, the browser image worked for you even without this I've checked the case of I think from k6-operator perspective, just knowing of this second image with browser support is sufficient: it's too large to make a default runner image. IOW, it'd be good if we could make a remark on browser images in the docs, at some point. |
Yes. I didn't seem to have any issues related to this. 🤷
Here is my scenario. I'm using a test script using the My K6 resource successfully executes if
|
Any update on this one? |
Add support for distributed k6-browser scripts.