Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ability to override servicePath #126

Open
clement-hollander opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Ability to override servicePath #126

clement-hollander opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@clement-hollander
Copy link

Could we override the servicePath for service that have a sandbox mode, for sample : https://developers.google.com/shopping-content/v2/orders-guide#modes ?
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added the triage me I really want to be triaged. label Jul 27, 2018
@mattwhisenhunt
Copy link

It's probably better to regenerate those files for that service completely.
#44 is the real fix that you need but for now here is the sandbox version of that service:
Services.zip

@mattwhisenhunt mattwhisenhunt added type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns. priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. labels Jul 30, 2018
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith removed the triage me I really want to be triaged. label Jul 30, 2018
@yoshi-automation yoshi-automation added the 🚨 This issue needs some love. label Jan 22, 2019
@dwsupplee dwsupplee added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. and removed 🚨 This issue needs some love. priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns. labels Oct 19, 2019
@spipu
Copy link

spipu commented Jan 3, 2020

here is the feature : #189

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@JustinBeckwith @clement-hollander @dwsupplee @mattwhisenhunt @spipu @yoshi-automation