We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Great thanks for your effort in explaining this work with this repo. It helps me a lot.
Just a small question for the derivation in the paper, in Eq(43), it derives the score matching loss as below,
$\mathcal{L}_{SM}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}\left[\lambda(t)\Vert{s_t(x) - \nabla{\log{p_t(x|x_1)}}}\Vert^2\right] = \mathbb{E}\left[\lambda(t)\Vert{s_t(x) - \frac{x-\mu_t(x_1)}{\sigma_t^2(x_1)}}\Vert^2\right]$,
where $p_t(x|x_1) = \mathcal{N}(x|\mu_t(x_1), \sigma_t^2(x_1)\mathbf{I})$. But given the derivation of Gaussian, this seems should be,
$\mathcal{L}_{SM}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}\left[\lambda(t)\Vert{s_t(x) + \frac{x-\mu_t(x_1)}{\sigma_t^2(x_1)}}\Vert^2\right]$.
Right? It confuses me to connect the theories behind ddpm, score-based, sde, flow-mathcing together. :(
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Great thanks for your effort in explaining this work with this repo. It helps me a lot.
Just a small question for the derivation in the paper, in Eq(43), it derives the score matching loss as below,
where$p_t(x|x_1) = \mathcal{N}(x|\mu_t(x_1), \sigma_t^2(x_1)\mathbf{I})$ . But given the derivation of Gaussian, this seems should be,
Right? It confuses me to connect the theories behind ddpm, score-based, sde, flow-mathcing together. :(
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: