From 096baa2b6c3cb0b30c67b5083d37c4fef05942cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Loren Matilsky Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 14:36:34 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fairly certain there's a missing c_7 in ohmic heating Similar to the (formerly) missing c_5 in the viscous heating. --- doc/source/User_Guide/physics_math_overview.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/source/User_Guide/physics_math_overview.rst b/doc/source/User_Guide/physics_math_overview.rst index a641a34c..6ae56b98 100644 --- a/doc/source/User_Guide/physics_math_overview.rst +++ b/doc/source/User_Guide/physics_math_overview.rst @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ respectively. The evolution of :math:`\Theta` is described by c_6\,\boldsymbol{\nabla}\cdot\left[\mathrm{f}_1(r)\,\mathrm{f}_4(r)\,\mathrm{f}_5(r)\,\boldsymbol{\nabla}\Theta \right] \\ +\ c_{10}\,\mathrm{f}_6(r) + c_8\,\Phi(r,\theta,\phi) - + c_9\,\mathrm{f}_7(r)|\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\boldsymbol{B}|^2, + + c_9\,c_7\,\mathrm{f}_7(r)|\boldsymbol{\nabla}\times\boldsymbol{B}|^2, where the viscous heating :math:`\Phi` is given by