You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2020. It is now read-only.
Hi,
I got a question referring to "sample name + 6 numbers" pattern and the number for AD tag when looking through the output files from pindel. Could you please help me out?
First, the 6 numbers following sample name, I have already read the explanations from b706fba. Still confused about the first 2 numbers, are they the depth (ref + alt) or only the ref count?
By the way, just want to clear up that the larger one of these 2 numbers will be used as the first number in AD tag when converting pindel result to vcf file, right?
Screenshot below is the text I read, as you can see, both "read depth" and "reference coverage" are used in describing the first 2 numbers, so which one is correct, the ref OR ref + alt
Thanks,
Nan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi,
I got a question referring to "sample name + 6 numbers" pattern and the number for AD tag when looking through the output files from pindel. Could you please help me out?
First, the 6 numbers following sample name, I have already read the explanations from b706fba. Still confused about the first 2 numbers, are they the depth (ref + alt) or only the ref count?
By the way, just want to clear up that the larger one of these 2 numbers will be used as the first number in AD tag when converting pindel result to vcf file, right?
Screenshot below is the text I read, as you can see, both "read depth" and "reference coverage" are used in describing the first 2 numbers, so which one is correct, the ref OR ref + alt
Thanks,
Nan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: