-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TX Output missing in GetAddressUnspentOutputs #492
Comments
After some digging I found that the node of imaginary username is the only one recording all TX currently. Talking with him to figure out why.
Worst case we have to bootstrap from his local DB |
I see the same number of transactions on all nodes... All have 2 confirmed transactions for that address... |
I am able to see both transactions in this ticket on my node. Easy to check at https://explore.cash. https://explore.cash/mainnet/tx/66b1167575fdb40d632bdd94114fccdfa10e1ec28fec767ce7bf44dc507475ce |
Please do
B. Alexander Ramos.
…________________________________
From: Josh Ellithorpe ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 2:53:12 AM
To: gcash/bchd ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [gcash/bchd] TX Output missing in GetAddressUnspentOutputs (Issue #492)
I am able to see both transactions in this ticket on my node. Easy to check at https://explore.cash.
https://explore.cash/mainnet/tx/66b1167575fdb40d632bdd94114fccdfa10e1ec28fec767ce7bf44dc507475ce
https://explore.cash/mainnet/tx/867fc01be92ce90c8d51ee2f8f5ee9b372049505eb477e734b7d71d5c787044b
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#492 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUMCSRLCTRTQ3EMVN7JMI7LULDHORANCNFSM5HROWNWQ>.
|
I didn't know about the BCHD explorer. Great thx! The electroncash node doesn't have my last TX (that imaginary username has), but because its behind from chain tip:
These errors have been starting about 2 days ago on prompt.cash and manual inspection showed each time that the TX was indeed not recorded at that time. Will monitor it more, but for now we conclude its only long delays for now? |
Thank you so much
B. Alexander Ramos.
…________________________________
From: Ekliptor ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 3:15:46 AM
To: gcash/bchd ***@***.***>
Cc: Alex ramos ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [gcash/bchd] TX Output missing in GetAddressUnspentOutputs (Issue #492)
I didn't know about the BCHD explorer. Great thx!
The electroncash node doesn't have my last TX (that imaginary username has), but because its behind from chain tip:
grpcurl -d '{"address": "bitcoincash:qpkajruupllffkut5ly690r35nvzwll64szqrgk0vf"}' bchd-mainnet.electroncash.de:8335 pb.bchrpc/GetAddressTransactions
These errors have been starting about 2 days ago on prompt.cash and manual inspection showed each time that the TX was indeed not recorded at that time.
Will monitor it more, but for now we conclude its only long delays for now?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#492 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUMCSRPEMCC7LWB7HDGTL4TULDKDFANCNFSM5HROWNWQ>.
|
I have an address with valid outputs: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/address/qpkajruupllffkut5ly690r35nvzwll64szqrgk0vf
Yet all BCHD nodes do not have any outputs for this address:
I checked BestHeight already and the 2 nodes above are at a height > 712,780 and therefore should have the TX.
Assuming I'm not missing something, this should eventually fork BCHD off the network? (unless bug in API layer)
edit.:
and I can confirm both TX hashes are also missing on the
GetTransaction()
API callThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: