The specification of which terms to linearise is messy #269
Closed
tommbendall
started this conversation in
Design discussion
Replies: 1 comment
-
This is handled much more neatly following #317 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently the terms to be linearised in an equation are specified through a dictionary, pairing term labels and fields. e.g.
Would it be better to replace
terms_to_linearise
with aterm_filter
that gets used by alabel_map
? How do we easily make this configurable?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions