Please take a moment to review this document in order to make the contribution process easy and effective for everyone involved.
Following these guidelines helps to communicate that you respect the time of the developers managing and developing this open source project. In return, they should reciprocate that respect in addressing your issue or assessing patches and features.
The FMI Specification is written in AsciiDoc, a plain-text mark-up format that can be converted to HTML, PDF and other formats.
If you havn’t already done so clone the repository with
git clone https://github.com/modelica/fmi-standard.git
or your favorite Git client. To build the HTML document you have two alternatives.
Alternative 1:
Docker (recommended)
-
Install Docker
-
Run the Asciidoctor Docker Container
docker run -it -v <fmi-standard>:/documents/ asciidoctor/docker-asciidoctor
where
<fmi-standard>
is the path to the cloned repository -
Generate the HTML document
asciidoctor -B /documents/ -b html5 docs/fmi_specification.adoc
Alternative 2:
Ruby and the AsciiDoctor gem
-
Install the AsciiDoctor Ruby gem
-
Generate the HTML document
asciidoctor -B <fmi-standard> -b html5 docs/fmi_specification.adoc
where
<fmi-standard>
is the path to the cloned repository
The generated docs/fmi_specification.html
can be viewed with any modern web browser.
The issue tracker is the preferred channel for Bug reports, Feature requests and submitting Pull requests, but please respect the following restrictions:
-
Please do not use the issue tracker for personal support requests (use Stack Overflow).
-
Please do not derail or troll issues. Keep the discussion on topic and respect the opinions of others.
A bug is a demonstrable problem that is caused by the code in the repository. Good bug reports are extremely helpful - thank you!
Guidelines for bug reports:
-
Use the GitHub issue search — check if the issue has already been reported.
-
Check if the issue has been fixed — try to reproduce it using the latest
master
or development branch in the repository. -
Isolate the problem — create a reduced test case or example.
A good bug report shouldn’t leave others needing to chase you up for more information. Please try to be as detailed as possible in your report. What is your environment? What steps will reproduce the issue? What browser(s) and OS experience the problem? What would you expect to be the outcome? All these details will help people to fix any potential bugs.
Example:
Short and descriptive example bug report title A summary of the issue and the platform/OS environment in which it occurs. If suitable, include the steps required to reproduce the bug. 1. This is the first step 2. This is the second step 3. Further steps, etc. `<url>` - a link to the reduced test case Any other information you want to share that is relevant to the issue being reported. This might include the lines of code that you have identified as causing the bug, and potential solutions (and your opinions on their merits).
Feature requests are welcome. But take a moment to find out whether your idea fits with the scope and aims of the project. It’s up to you to make a strong case to convince the project’s developers of the merits of this feature. Please provide as much detail and context as possible.
Please follow the seven rules of a great Git commit message when committing your changes:
-
Separate subject from body with a blank line
-
Limit the subject line to 50 characters
-
Capitalize the subject line
-
Do not end the subject line with a period
-
Use the imperative mood in the subject line
-
Wrap the body at 72 characters
-
Use the body to explain what and why vs. how
For example:
Summarize changes in around 50 characters or less More detailed explanatory text, if necessary. Wrap it to about 72 characters or so. In some contexts, the first line is treated as the subject of the commit and the rest of the text as the body. The blank line separating the summary from the body is critical (unless you omit the body entirely); various tools like `log`, `shortlog` and `rebase` can get confused if you run the two together. Explain the problem that this commit is solving. Focus on why you are making this change as opposed to how (the code explains that). Are there side effects or other unintuitive consequences of this change? Here's the place to explain them. Further paragraphs come after blank lines. - Bullet points are okay, too - Typically a hyphen or asterisk is used for the bullet, preceded by a single space, with blank lines in between, but conventions vary here If you use an issue tracker, put references to them at the bottom, like this: Resolves: #123 See also: #456, #789
Good pull requests - patches, improvements, new features - are a fantastic help. They should remain focused in scope and avoid containing unrelated commits.
Please ask first before embarking on any significant pull request (e.g. implementing features, refactoring code, porting to a different language), otherwise you risk spending a lot of time working on something that the project’s developers might not want to merge into the project.
Please adhere to the coding conventions used throughout a project (indentation, accurate comments, etc.) and any other requirements (such as test coverage).
Follow this process if you’d like your work considered for inclusion in the project:
-
Fork the project, clone your fork, and configure the remotes:
# Clone your fork of the repo into the current directory git clone https://github.com/<your-username>/<repo-name> # Navigate to the newly cloned directory cd <repo-name> # Assign the original repo to a remote called "upstream" git remote add upstream https://github.com/<upstream-owner>/<repo-name>
-
If you cloned a while ago, get the latest changes from upstream:
git checkout <dev-branch> git pull upstream <dev-branch>
-
Create a new topic branch (off the main project development branch) to contain your feature, change, or fix:
git checkout -b <topic-branch-name>
-
Commit your changes in logical chunks. Please adhere to the above rules when crafting Commit messages or your code is unlikely be merged into the main project. Use Git’s interactive rebase feature to tidy up your commits before making them public.
-
Locally merge (or rebase) the upstream development branch into your topic branch:
git pull [--rebase] upstream <dev-branch>
-
Push your topic branch up to your fork:
git push origin <topic-branch-name>
-
Open a Pull Request with a clear title and description.
IMPORTANT: By submitting a patch, you agree to allow the project owner to license your work under the same license as that used by the project.
We use a branching scheme with support and feature branches that allows us to maintain multiple major and minor releases concurrently.
- Main development branch
master
-
Holds the latest development version. This is where the next version of the standard is developed.
- Feature branches
feature/<name>
-
New features are developed on feature branches that branch from and are merged back into
master
.Example:
feature/hybrid-co-simulation
- Support branches
support/v<major>{.<minor>}.x
-
Upon every major release the latest version of
master
is taggedv<major>.0
. The maintenance of this release is performed on a support branchv<major>.x
starting at this tag. This process is repeated for minor and patch releases.Examples:
support/v3.x
,support/v2.0.x
- Tags
v<major>.<minor>{.<patch>}{-{alpha|beta|rc}.<number>}
-
Releases and pre-releases are tagged on the respective branches following the Semantic Versioning.
Examples:
v3.0-alpha.3
,v3.0-beta.2
,v3.0-rc.1
,v3.0
master
|
+--->+ branch "support/v2.0.x", tag "v2.0.1"
| |
| + tag "v2.0.2"
|
+<--- merge PR "fix-typo-in-fmi-spec"
|
+--->+ branch "feature/arrays"
| |
+<---+ merge "feature/arrays"
|
+--->+ branch "support/v3.x", tag "v3.0"
| |
| +--->+ branch "support/v3.0.x", tag "v3.0.1"
| | |
| | + tag "v3.0.1"
| |
| + tag "v3.1"
| |
. .
. .
All contributors have to sign the Corporate Contributor License Agreement (CCLA). Therefore, the first step is getting your company to agree and sign the CCLA. The CCLA ensures that all IP contributed to the FMI standard will be licensed to the Modelica Association (MA) which in turn will sublicense the FMI standard to tool vendors implementing it and end users using it, free of charge.
When writing or editing the specification documents please follow the AsciiDoc Recommended Practices, particularly:
-
Use Atx style section titles
-
Use four dashes (
----
) for delimited blocks -
Use the asterisk (
*
) as marker for nested lists
The figures in the document should be provided as SVGs (Scalable Vector Graphics) and stored in docs/images
. We use draw.io to create and edit the figures. When you have created or edited a figure
-
select
File > Export as > SVG…
-
check
Transparent Background
-
uncheck
Include a copy of my diagram
to export the SVG that can be embedded into the AsciiDoc document. Make sure you also save the original file using File > Save as…
with the same name as the SVG (file extension .xml
) and commit the files together.