Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ERROR: Constraint failure in RATTLE algorithm for atom 2572! #72

Open
bhavranek opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

ERROR: Constraint failure in RATTLE algorithm for atom 2572! #72

bhavranek opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@bhavranek
Copy link

I have tried to create simulation files using both BFEE and BFEE2 and no matter what whenever I run simulation on step 002_euler_theta I get the same error:

ERROR: Constraint failure in RATTLE algorithm for atom 2572!
ERROR: Constraint failure; simulation has become unstable.

I have tried everything suggested online. Including changing the timestep, increasing minimization to get rid of unfavorable contacts, increasing margin, etc. However, nothing has worked.

Are there any suggestions?

@fhh2626 @HanatoK
Thank you!

@fhh2626
Copy link
Owner

fhh2626 commented Jul 14, 2021

Did you use the latest version of NAMD, i.e. 2.15 alpha?
I also suggest checking the structure of the complex in eq.coor to see if there is anything wrong. If everything is correct, the protein-ligand complex should be located at the center of the box

@bhavranek
Copy link
Author

bhavranek commented Jul 14, 2021

I used NAMD 2.14 and I also tried NAMD 3.0. Is there a difference with NAMD 2.15 that would make it work better? Everything looks okay when I view the equilibration simulation. I am not sure what else to do. I tried everything. The system is not very big either only 169 residues with a small ligand. @fhh2626

I downloaded Linux-x86_64-multicore-CUDA (NVIDIA CUDA acceleration) under Version Nightly Build (2021-07-14) Platforms:
https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Development/Download/download.cgi?PackageName=NAMD

I tried the non CUDA accelerated build with no luck.

@fhh2626
Copy link
Owner

fhh2626 commented Jul 22, 2021

I used NAMD 2.14 and I also tried NAMD 3.0. Is there a difference with NAMD 2.15 that would make it work better? Everything looks okay when I view the equilibration simulation. I am not sure what else to do. I tried everything. The system is not very big either only 169 residues with a small ligand. @fhh2626

I downloaded Linux-x86_64-multicore-CUDA (NVIDIA CUDA acceleration) under Version Nightly Build (2021-07-14) Platforms:
https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Development/Download/download.cgi?PackageName=NAMD

I tried the non CUDA accelerated build with no luck.

I am not sure what happened on your system. You can:

i) check if there are atoms with a coordinate of (0, 0, 0) in your PDB file;
ii) try to output eulerTheta CV during the equilibration step, and see what will happen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants