Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] choosing trust member in auto level mode #484

Open
hixku opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[Feature Request] choosing trust member in auto level mode #484

hixku opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request unconfirmed This issue is unconfirmed

Comments

@hixku
Copy link

hixku commented Sep 26, 2024

What problem are you trying to fix?

Alphi always got chosen after all trust are lv.100, but his healing is slower and thus makes us more likely to die in ID.

What is the solution to the problem?

Add trust member choosing in auto leveling mode so the result is more stable.

Alternative solutions

No response

Additional context

No response

@hixku hixku added enhancement New feature or request unconfirmed This issue is unconfirmed labels Sep 26, 2024
@erdelf
Copy link
Collaborator

erdelf commented Sep 28, 2024

If all trust members are at 100, you can select your chosen group. You might have to switch to a lvl 100 char once before to register the lvls of higher trust members.

@SorryLorry
Copy link

To add on to the OP,
Yes we could select the group we want, however that applies only to the initial run.
So I choose to do 7 runs of auto levelling, and selected Urianger as my healer,
1st instance will be running perfectly fine with the party members i selected, on 2nd instance onwards, Urianger is not selected anymore and defaults back to alphinaud

@erdelf
Copy link
Collaborator

erdelf commented Oct 21, 2024

Uh.. yeah that is technically fixed already but there was no push since then, so should be fixed in 173

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request unconfirmed This issue is unconfirmed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants