You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current version of fact.features.singlePulse.timeLineExtraction.TemplatePulse we use a template according to an old ceres.rc (The one from the Mars Trunk in svn). It looks like this:
I opt for exploring different pulse template shapes when we managed to close the loop with the simulation truth on the pulses from CERES/MARS. But it is good that we noticed this mismatch of the different pulse templates.
In the current version of fact.features.singlePulse.timeLineExtraction.TemplatePulse we use a template according to an old ceres.rc (The one from the Mars Trunk in svn). It looks like this:
PulseShape.Function.Name: (1.626*(1-exp(-0.3803*0.5*x))*exp(-0.0649*0.5*x))
In ceres12.rc the following template is used:
PulseShape.Function.Name: (1.239*(1-1/(1+exp((0.5*x-2.851)/1.063)))*exp(-(0.5*x-2.851)/19.173))
We should check the impact of these different functions to the extractors performance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: