You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my particular case I have a heavily masked sequence track with the unmasked amino acids with coordinates provided and a secondary structure track with only a few masked position. Is it better to to first predict the structure or first predict the sequence?
Or more general: Is their a general rule which track should be predicted first?
Thanks for any feed-back
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unfortunately, I don't have a general rule on which tracks to sample. It differs from prompt to prompt, and also depends on what you're trying to predict. If you're looking at a problem that's very structural, then first predicting structure tokens is the way to go.
Thanks for providing this comprehensive model open-source.
I was wondering what the correct sequence of predictions is:
In your examples, e.g. with the Carbonic Anhydrase (2vvb) the following order is used:
For the GFP evolution gfp_design.ipynb (related to your publication) the order is:
In my particular case I have a heavily masked sequence track with the unmasked amino acids with coordinates provided and a secondary structure track with only a few masked position. Is it better to to first predict the structure or first predict the sequence?
Or more general: Is their a general rule which track should be predicted first?
Thanks for any feed-back
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: