You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Simulated trees or sets of trees are commonly used in testing estimation routines of branching process models. Simulation of a phylogeny conditioned on number of tips involves some subtlety (Stadler 2011 ); an R package is dedicated to this task alone (TreeSim).
How do we express that a tree has been generated in this way, rather than inferred from a character matrix? Is it necessary to distinguish more broadly between simulated data and "real" data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Simulated trees or sets of trees are commonly used in testing estimation routines of branching process models. Simulation of a phylogeny conditioned on number of tips involves some subtlety (Stadler 2011 ); an R package is dedicated to this task alone (TreeSim).
How do we express that a tree has been generated in this way, rather than inferred from a character matrix? Is it necessary to distinguish more broadly between simulated data and "real" data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: