-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance FragmentationMatchScore with additional metrics #547
Comments
Return to this after starting |
Implement spectral entropy score paper: source code:
|
more information about various spectral scoring approaches: |
Modified cosine score, as it is explained in the original manuscript (https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1203689109): Vector similarities are calculated for every possible pair of spectra with a This has come to mean something more specific: Two peaks are considered a potential match if their m/z ratios lie within the given ‘tolerance’, or if their m/z ratios lie within the tolerance once a mass-shift is applied. The mass shift is simply the difference in precursor-m/z between the two spectra. So, a peak may match another peak after a mass-shift is applied. See this implementation: It looks like they are matching to both the |
Inspired by ASMS 2024, re-opening this case. Introduced now in modified cosine score, flash entropy, kullback-leibler divergence, Jansen-Shanon divergence, etc. |
spectral entropy python: |
Including (but not limited to), modified cosine score, neutral loss match score, and the updated cosine score.
This can be used very generally, and updated in the GUI, but was originally devised as a part of #543, #546, and associated
mass_spec
case https://github.com/calico/mass_spec/issues/752The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: