Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support UC_* specified in TFM_* tables #153

Open
olejandro opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Support UC_* specified in TFM_* tables #153

olejandro opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@olejandro
Copy link
Member

          > The rule I'm using is that parameters starting with UC are extracted from the ~UC_T table, and all others from ~FI_T

Note that parameters starting with UC can be defined also in any TFM_* tables. The Column for specifying the UC_N in TFM_* tables is UC_N. As always, the scenario order in the run case will determine, which value will survive (when the same instance of a parameter is defined in several scenarios), But I am not sure what will happen if the same parameter is defined in several tables in the same scenario (e.g. both ~UCT and TFM_* in the same scenario), haven't tested that.

Originally posted by @Antti-L in #148 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant