We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For example, @lightclient is both an author and an editor: ethereum/EIPs#6642
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I made it so that it double counts for the special case of moving from Stagnant. LMK if that seems unreasonable.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Can we make it so editors don't count as editors for proposals they're authoring in any case? I think that's the most consistent, if more annoying.
They don't, or at least, they shouldn't. Is there a case you can point to where this happened?
I thought "double counts" in your comment meant counting as an editor and as an author in the special case of moving out of stagnant.
It does mean that. I thought your comment meant other cases.
No branches or pull requests
For example, @lightclient is both an author and an editor: ethereum/EIPs#6642
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: