Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi @brentjohnston Ill move this over to the Discussions area. With the 2.0.3 model, when they first released it, my god did it sound terrible coqui-ai/TTS#3306 I'm not sure if they messed something up with the models configuration file. However. I believe they did eventually correct this....eventually. Id welcome people to play with it and give feedback. If enough people give feedback that its overall better, I can swap the base model on initial setup of AllTalk. You can actually download the If people want to test out and feed back, Im happy to listen. Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just wanted to add these personal findings here for anyone reading also, let me know your results:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A bit different than erew123's chat findings from back in November here, and not sure why. I just tried to train over the coqui v2 2.0.3 model and got less "feeling they are reading from a script" when voice talks.
Accuracy similar or better and better flow. I'd recommend trying it out again with method below just to make sure, link here: https://huggingface.co/coqui/XTTS-v2/tree/v2.0.3
For anyone here that wants to try: Backup the files in
\extensions\alltalk_tts\models\xttsv2_2.0.2
download all the new files and put in there. Train over base again.Not sure if this was the difference: I merged 3 of the most accurate samples from the previous trainings in voices folder. Merged them into one file as a .wav and placed in the
\extensions\alltalk_tts\finetune\put-voice-samples-in-here
folder, and used that for finetuning (in addition to the original dataset) then used that same merged .wav file for the voice selection.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions