From f99fdc02be0fb13790ef4127c3e4a4bda698ad99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcel <me@sirmarcel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 13:58:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in 04_Matrix_error_bounds.jl (#8)

---
 src/04_Matrix_error_bounds.jl | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/04_Matrix_error_bounds.jl b/src/04_Matrix_error_bounds.jl
index 11050e4..6679d01 100644
--- a/src/04_Matrix_error_bounds.jl
+++ b/src/04_Matrix_error_bounds.jl
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ md"""
 # ╔═╡ 4eb5e944-000f-4755-b039-63591d1dab8a
 md"""
 Given a sufficiently good eigenvector $\tilde{v}$ **Kato-Temple-type bounds**
-are considerably **shaper** than Bauer-Fike bounds.
+are considerably **sharper** than Bauer-Fike bounds.
 Their main complication is that the gap $\delta$ requires access to the **exact** eigenvalue and is thus usually not directly computable.
 However, one can usually determine an approximate gap as we will detail below.