-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How well energy storage capacity is represented in the dataset? #1
Comments
Dear Matteo, Im interested in how energy storage capacities are estimated and just wanted to know if you have a link/sorce for the NVE database where they provide the 'energiEkvivalent_kWh_m3' and the volume of storage. Thanks in advance! |
Hi, I have also looked into it recently and I'll let him correct me if it is wrong but I think he obtained the energy equivalent from the NVE Vannkraftdatabase and the volume from the column "OPPSTRVOL" in the table starting around p.240 in this report. |
We use essentially two files: The size of the storage is taken from the column |
Can I just confirm that the MWh of storage quoted are 'usable' rather than the total in the reservoir? thanks Michael |
Yes, I confirm. In all the cases, the reported reservoir capacity (MWh
and/or hm3) is the 'usable' part.
…On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 11:11 AM mtaylor72 ***@***.***> wrote:
Can I just confirm that the MWh of storage quoted are 'usable' rather than
the total in the reservoir? thanks Michael
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQQYASHTXNCUQ42ZJ7JK4TTDM24NANCNFSM4HFDRBIQ>
.
--
Matteo
|
Thanks for the quick repsonse! |
Hi Matteo, What is in particular of my interest is the plant named 'Villarino VLLRINO 1G - Almendra (Villarino) Hydroelectric Power Plant Spain'. According to your dataset, it has a storage energy capacity of 3.1 TWh and a power capacity of 851 MW. This corresponds to a discharge time (duration) of 3666 hours. I am not exactly familiar with how the Villarino plant operates, but it seems quite impressive. Is this true, is it a bug, or does it relate to the above disclaimer regarding how well energy storage capacity is represented? I have furthermore compared your reported cumulative energy capacity of pumped-hydro storage (approximately 11TWh) with a study from 2015 by Geth et al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.145) who finds it to be one order of magnitude lower (approximately 1.5 TWh). Again, could the discrepancy relate to how well energy storage capacity is represented? Best regards |
Dear @ebbekyhl, yes the Villarino plant is quite impressive: the size of its reservoir is also confirmed in this news https://www.lagacetadesalamanca.es/provincia/viaje-a-las-entranas-de-la-central-de-villarino-CH900206 The paper by Geth et al. is indeed a very good paper, but we think that our collected data might be more accurate because we tried to collect multiple sources for most of the biggest plants. For example, they don't report the storage size ( |
Thanks for turning back to me and for clarifying, @matteodefelice. |
Hi both, Villarino is one of the hybrid (PHS + reservoir) hydro plants in Spain. I would suggest not considering it a PHS plant since its energy capacity (3TWh) is two orders of magnitude larger than the estimated energy capacity for PHS in Spain (around 72 GWh) and this can introduce significant errors. |
Thanks @martavp, this is indeed very interesting. It would be nice to be able to understand how much of this storage is "managed" as bi-directional. I tend to agree with you, probably we are drastically overestimating the PHS capacity in Spain... |
Are there plans to fix this? Or perhaps this is an old problem that is already fixed? |
Hi everyone,
May I ask you to open an issue on Github and propose a solution? I think
it's worth keeping track of this kind of discussions.
Would you suggest splitting in two? Or just classifying it as a reservoir?
Let's continue there, what do you think?
…On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:20 AM Ivan Ruiz Manuel ***@***.***> wrote:
Are there plans to fix this?
I think other datasets (powerplantmatching) are correcting for the Spain
issue...
Or perhaps this is an old problem that is already fixed?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQQYAWZJ75Q7KKZNV4DOZLZRMHLVAVCNFSM6AAAAABMP2FUOOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOBYGEZTENJQGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
--
Matteo
|
I am including here a question I have received from Alexander.
This was my answer:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: