diff --git a/print.html b/print.html index c4b4588..e6d981f 100644 --- a/print.html +++ b/print.html @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@
There is a set of predefined proposal actions that can be proposed and voted on. Everyone can start a proposal on any action (ie. set basic income to 48 LEU) at any time. There can even be multiple proposals ongoing in parallel.
-Every member of the community can use their personhood reputation to vote on each proposal. A proposal gets approved if has enough Aye votes continuously for a long enough time period.
+Every member of the community can use their personhood reputation to vote on each proposal. A proposal gets approved if it has enough Aye votes continuously for a long enough time period.
Let's assume a proposal has been submitted at the end of the last registering phase. During the first day, the proposal doesn't reach the minimal turnout yet, but on day two it enters the passing state and the confirmation period starts. More people make up their mind and vote Nay, so the proposal drops out of confirming state before the end of the confirmation period. Over time, more Aye votes are coming in and the approval threshold is surpassed. This time, the proposal stays in the passing state during the entire confirmation period gets approved. Any community member can call the lazy evaluation and the proposal action will be scheduled for enaction at the start of the upcoming registering phase.
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@Each successful cycle attendance for a set of eligible cycles gives you one vote. We currently allow only reputations older than the previous cycle but younger than the reputation lifetime (relative to proposal submission) to participate in the vote. This is because the count of those reputations is not subject to change anymore. We need a reliable count of all eligible reputations in order to determine the maximum amount of possible votes (the electorate), which is required for AQB and to determine the minimum turnout.
+Each successful cycle attendance for a set of eligible cycles gives you one vote. We currently allow only reputations older than the previous cycle but younger than the reputation lifetime (relative to proposal submission) to participate in the vote. This is because the count of those reputations is not subject to change anymore. We need a reliable count of all eligible reputations in order to determine the maximum amount of possible votes (the electorate), which is required for Adaptive Quorum Biasing (AQB) and to determine the minimum turnout.
Your own voting power depends on the number of cycles you have attended during the eligible period. The more cycles you have attended during this period, the more voting power you have. This is a sybil-resilient approximation of universal suffrage which rewards your dedication to participate in community cycles regularly. Thanks to the reputation lifetime, however, there is no undue bias towards longtime community members as only recent reputation is eligible for voting.
There is a set of predefined proposal actions that can be proposed and voted on. Everyone can start a proposal on any action (ie. set basic income to 48 LEU) at any time. There can even be multiple proposals ongoing in parallel.
-Every member of the community can use their personhood reputation to vote on each proposal. A proposal gets approved if has enough Aye votes continuously for a long enough time period.
+Every member of the community can use their personhood reputation to vote on each proposal. A proposal gets approved if it has enough Aye votes continuously for a long enough time period.
Let's assume a proposal has been submitted at the end of the last registering phase. During the first day, the proposal doesn't reach the minimal turnout yet, but on day two it enters the passing state and the confirmation period starts. More people make up their mind and vote Nay, so the proposal drops out of confirming state before the end of the confirmation period. Over time, more Aye votes are coming in and the approval threshold is surpassed. This time, the proposal stays in the passing state during the entire confirmation period gets approved. Any community member can call the lazy evaluation and the proposal action will be scheduled for enaction at the start of the upcoming registering phase.
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@Each successful cycle attendance for a set of eligible cycles gives you one vote. We currently allow only reputations older than the previous cycle but younger than the reputation lifetime (relative to proposal submission) to participate in the vote. This is because the count of those reputations is not subject to change anymore. We need a reliable count of all eligible reputations in order to determine the maximum amount of possible votes (the electorate), which is required for AQB and to determine the minimum turnout.
+Each successful cycle attendance for a set of eligible cycles gives you one vote. We currently allow only reputations older than the previous cycle but younger than the reputation lifetime (relative to proposal submission) to participate in the vote. This is because the count of those reputations is not subject to change anymore. We need a reliable count of all eligible reputations in order to determine the maximum amount of possible votes (the electorate), which is required for Adaptive Quorum Biasing (AQB) and to determine the minimum turnout.
Your own voting power depends on the number of cycles you have attended during the eligible period. The more cycles you have attended during this period, the more voting power you have. This is a sybil-resilient approximation of universal suffrage which rewards your dedication to participate in community cycles regularly. Thanks to the reputation lifetime, however, there is no undue bias towards longtime community members as only recent reputation is eligible for voting.