You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey!
Your right, that's a bug. I'm in no position to solve it the coming week (deadline!). If you're in a hurry, please fork, give it a go and send me a merge request.
Glad to hear you like GLOW and I'm really looking forward to see what you're cooking!
ATM, i am just creating a 0 size texture and got it working.
One thing which I am observing is that with GLOW, CPU usage is little on
the higher side, when I simply rotate a cube (around 30%), compared to same
scenario in THREE.js (around 5-6%).
Hey!
Your right, that's a bug. I'm in no position to solve it the coming week
(deadline!). If you're in a hurry, please fork, give it a go and send me a
merge request.
Glad to hear you like GLOW and I'm really looking forward to see what
you're cooking!
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #8 (comment)
Oh! Really? Interesting. Having worked a lot with the Three.js WebGLRenderer I'm quite surprised. Did you profile it to see where the bottleneck is? Do you have an example to share?
When i clone a shader, code seems to be looking for element, while a regular compile looks for indices, etc.
For now, i am using modified code. Will appreciate if this bug is fixed.
Btw, excellent work. If my work becomes relevant, will definitely send a reference for your listing :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: