You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Just an improvement to the prediction model. Usually, Decreasing and High Spike follow the same pattern until late into the week, then one skyrockets and the other continues.
But I think that if the Guaranteed Min is hit early, say on Monday, then it will ultimately be Decreasing. It is not clear if Guaranteed Min can be hit more than once.
There are other cases too where if you have not hit Guaranteed Min yet later in the week, then the odds of the increase should be a lot higher.
Describe the solution you'd like
Update the modelling to take into account Guaranteed Min.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The problem here is the code that generates decreasing pattern and high spike (decreasing part) is practically the same. And no one can tell them apart.
I can't think a way to make the Guaranteed Min value better because effectively, on a decreasing pattern, Monday AM is the best and Guaranteed Min.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Just an improvement to the prediction model. Usually, Decreasing and High Spike follow the same pattern until late into the week, then one skyrockets and the other continues.
But I think that if the Guaranteed Min is hit early, say on Monday, then it will ultimately be Decreasing. It is not clear if Guaranteed Min can be hit more than once.
There are other cases too where if you have not hit Guaranteed Min yet later in the week, then the odds of the increase should be a lot higher.
Describe the solution you'd like
Update the modelling to take into account Guaranteed Min.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: