You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is possible to receive and send messaged directly to queues instead of exchanges, see this guide for example.
We currently only use the exchange for naming transactions and client spans, which is sub optimal in this case. We should provide an option to use the RabbitMQ routingKey instead.
In my opinion we should offer an enum-like configuration option (e.g. rabbitmq_naming_mode) to do this. This way we won't end up with multiple boolean options in case we see the need to further customize the naming scheme.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is possible to receive and send messaged directly to queues instead of exchanges, see this guide for example.
We currently only use the exchange for naming transactions and client spans, which is sub optimal in this case. We should provide an option to use the RabbitMQ
routingKey
instead.In my opinion we should offer an enum-like configuration option (e.g.
rabbitmq_naming_mode
) to do this. This way we won't end up with multiple boolean options in case we see the need to further customize the naming scheme.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: