Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This library is out-of-date #27

Open
michaeleisel opened this issue Nov 18, 2014 · 6 comments
Open

This library is out-of-date #27

michaeleisel opened this issue Nov 18, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@michaeleisel
Copy link

There should at least be a message on the main page stating that this library is out-of-date.

@wuf810
Copy link

wuf810 commented Apr 22, 2015

What do you mean by out of date? No longer required, no longer valid, or doesn't work? You need to be a bit clearer on what you are saying

@michaeleisel
Copy link
Author

The library had a number of serious bugs when I used it, and given
that parse's library now covers this functionality and will be maintaining
their code, this library should no longer exist. It only diverts people
from the proper solution of using what parse gives us.

I can see how you might want this library to gain more control over
serialization rather than doing it the parse way. In that case, the readme
should reflect parse's library and the serious bugs should be fixed.

The code base and readme, as is, is a detriment to programmers.

On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Michael Kaye [email protected] wrote:

What do you mean by out of date? No longer required, no valid, doesn't
work? You need to be a bit clearer on what you are saying


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#27 (comment).

@wuf810
Copy link

wuf810 commented Apr 23, 2015

Thanks for the update. Not sure what the Parse approach is but I find it odd they still haven't added NSCopying to their own code. There are always valid reasons you might need to serialised data (exchanging data with Watch apps for example).

Anyway if this library is buggy and out of date, your point is now clear which is good!

@wuf810
Copy link

wuf810 commented Apr 29, 2015

BTW How do you handle the need for a local version of an PFObject if you don't have network to load it from Parse. That is the main reason we might want to serialise and store i.e. offline mode

@michaeleisel
Copy link
Author

Just check out parses pinning and play with it.

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Michael Kaye [email protected] wrote:

BTW How do you handle the need for a local version of an PFObject if you
don't have network to load it from Parse. That is the main reason we might
want to serialise and store i.e. offline mode


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#27 (comment).

@drdaz
Copy link

drdaz commented Nov 25, 2016

Parse gave up on the local datastore (parse-community/Parse-SDK-dotNET#237), and it doesn't perform at all in its current state. This library is still very relevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants