You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The convention for the determinant used in the current Magma code is k-1 in the exponent, not k/2. (There's only one convention that makes a graded ring under just multiplication.)
So we are for example missing the cusp form of weight 5, level 1 for QQ(sqrt(5)) described e.g. on page 124 of Bruinier's 1-2-3 of modular forms. It can be constructed as a product of theta constants, and it admits a description as a Borcherds product. It's just a square root of a cusp form in weight 10, so we could see its q-expansion easily.
At some point, we need to get our conventions right to see the forms that should be there in odd weight; this might require us to fix/add/adjust Magma code underneath.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The convention for the determinant used in the current Magma code is k-1 in the exponent, not k/2. (There's only one convention that makes a graded ring under just multiplication.)
So we are for example missing the cusp form of weight 5, level 1 for QQ(sqrt(5)) described e.g. on page 124 of Bruinier's 1-2-3 of modular forms. It can be constructed as a product of theta constants, and it admits a description as a Borcherds product. It's just a square root of a cusp form in weight 10, so we could see its q-expansion easily.
At some point, we need to get our conventions right to see the forms that should be there in odd weight; this might require us to fix/add/adjust Magma code underneath.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: