You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One thing I've run into working in a tropical biodiversity hotspot is that some species that are traditionally thought to be rare only appear to be due to sampling bias. Whether it's because a species is nocturnal, has great aversion to any human disturbance (including scent), etc., there are few, if any, data sets that can be said to honestly represent their presence/densities on the landscape (e.g. pen-tailed treeshrews in Borneo; once thought to be scarce, but demonstrated to be quite populous at night). Especially for species whose life histories largely remain unknown, how can we be sure that a SAD honestly predicts their presence in a community?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One thing I've run into working in a tropical biodiversity hotspot is that some species that are traditionally thought to be rare only appear to be due to sampling bias. Whether it's because a species is nocturnal, has great aversion to any human disturbance (including scent), etc., there are few, if any, data sets that can be said to honestly represent their presence/densities on the landscape (e.g. pen-tailed treeshrews in Borneo; once thought to be scarce, but demonstrated to be quite populous at night). Especially for species whose life histories largely remain unknown, how can we be sure that a SAD honestly predicts their presence in a community?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: